50 years late

As it turns out, this year’s Nobel Prize for Literature went to Harold Pinter, the playwright. So much for the quasi-official speculation, circulated in the Swedish and Norwegian press (and eagerly passed on in this obscure corner of the world), that for the first time since Bertrand Russell and Winston Churchill two generations ago, the prize would go to a non-fiction writer. (Speculation, we are reminded once again, is most intense in closed societies, such as the Swedish Academy, the Norwegian Nobel Committee, or, let’s see, Malacanang or any branch of the military.)

I can’t help thinking the award, albeit deserved, comes almost half a century late. In contrast, the most recent deserved award, to J. M. Coetzee two years ago, came at the height of the author’s powers. (Have you read Coetzee’s wonderfully idiosyncratic Nobel Lecture? He returns to the Robinson Crusoe theme, which he had worried in previous books.) Or if not at the peak of his powers, then at least at that stage in the writer’s life when you know he still has a few more good books left to write.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Notes on Readings

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s