That, I understand, is the underlying Hillary strategy: To make Democratic delegates reconsider the inevitability of Barack Obama’s candidacy. But it seems it’s the New York Times which may be in the very act of regretting its earlier endorsement of Senator Clinton. See (by way of TPM Cafe) the Times editorial on Clinton’s expected victory in the Pennsylvania primary, published mere hours after the polls closed.
The opening paragraph of the editorial titled “The Low Road to Victory”:
The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.